Marlow WJ; Singhal R; Dheerendra S; Ralte P; Fischer J; Waseem M; Acta Orthopaedica Belgica; June 2012

Distal radius volar locking plates: does a variable angle locking system confer a clinical advantage?.

Citation: Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, June 2012, vol./is. 78/3(309-16), 0001-6462;0001-6462  (2012 Jun)

Author(s): Marlow WJ; Singhal R; Dheerendra S; Ralte P; Fischer J; Waseem M

Institution: MacclesfieldDistrictGeneralHospital, Macclesfield, UK.

Language: English

Abstract: This retrospective study compared clinical, radiological and subjective outcomes between patients with a distal radius fracture fixed with a variable angle or fixed angle volar locking plate. Radiological parameters were assessed between initial and final post-operative films. Post-operative clinical range of motion as a proportion of that in the opposite wrist was assessed clinically, and satisfaction and subjective outcomes were assessed by  questionnaire. One hundred and seven patients were included in the study; 65 underwent fixation with a variable angle and 42 with a fixed angle locking plate.

There were five complications and secondary operations in each group. There was no significant difference between the groups in radiological parameters measured or the proportional range of motion. Visual analogue scale, Mayo Wrist and Quick DASH scores were not significantly different between the groups. Neither the subjective nor clinical outcomes of this study demonstrated clinical superiority of either plate system.

Country of Publication: Belgium

Publication Type: Journal Article

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s